What Robert Barta said...

(For those not familiar with American blogging argot, the snowclone*:

What [name here] said

expresses intense agreement with whatever [name here] said). And that said, what Barta said:

My thesis is that we need more lc. Such as that:

"Alexander Johannesen", who authors someURL, which isa blog, holds-opinion, that adequacy has level low for tools topicmap-editors for task "authoring topic maps" .

+100, +10000, because Which comes first? Authoring! but how? However, let’s contextualize:

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, Alexander Johannesen” sed aenean mi, semper dolor sed. Commodo erat nostra, in purus, nonummy parturient massa scelerisque. Aut vulputate nunc vitae velit velit diam. Diam suscipit felis, tempor libero aliquam lorem wisi, ut nisl, tempor diam sagittis, who authors someURL, pharetra eu vestibulum dictumst. Risus sodales aliquam nullam nunc. Euismod non turpis. Massa porttitor mauris vitae, ut ac ut ac sit, arcu tempor non, blandit lectus sed tristique nascetur mi vel, vel odio posuere in.

Lectus metus, aliquam ipsum quam which isa blog, ipsum integer suspendisse ipsum. Mattis scelerisque porttitor sapien pede odio, ante sem. Sed suscipit esse scelerisque orci, bibendum neque urna purus, fusce lectus turpis. Taciti amet mauris et. Maecenas leo, lobortis sed feugiat dapibus placerat elementum diam, metus sapien odio phasellus optio. Ac nec holds-opinion, , pede dapibus viverra et tristique faucibus, dui vivamus velit. Nullam pulvinar non praesent eu ac, nullam elit rutrum id ut, justo eget vel senectus ligula metus sed, per justo suscipit justo, ipsum convallis velit suspendisse sint. Pede at that adequacy has level low for toolsmorbi nec, enim gravida, feugiat tincidunt vivamus, suspendisse odio cubilia ligula fringilla, tincidunt fermentum morbi blandit a per. Enim ut aliquam, dolor picmap-editors for task “authoring topic maps” .massa sapien leo quis vehicula irure, tristique lacinia.

But where are the delimiters?

Meaning, I don’t think people are going to be writing in pure lean languages any time soon. And, absent some nifty natural language processing — which is guaranteed to produce results some users will not be able to live with, just like spell- and grammar-checkers do — I don’t see how you can integrate a lean language into ordinary language absent an approach that uses markup. And so, the approach I’ve advocated, of integrating a “lean language” into prose, may be the right way to go. Which is not to say that the wiki-like syntax I designed is the right thing; it may not be.

NOTE * “Non-sexually reproduced journalistic textual templates.”